Info Gov

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has published a warning notice to remind the legal profession of their professional obligations when using artificial intelligence (AI).

The warning notice comes as the regulator revealed it had received 42 reports related to the potential misuse of AI between July 2025 and July 2026.

The SRA noted that while many law firms are using AI “safely and responsibly” to support tasks such as research, drafting, document review and administrative processes, recent cases had highlighted the importance of ensuring “appropriate human oversight”.

It set out the following key concerns:

  • AI-generated inaccuracies, or ‘hallucinations’ in legal research, advice, analysis and submissions to the court.    
  • Instances of confidential client information being entered into AI tools that lack appropriate safeguards, risking potential breaches of confidentiality and wider data protection requirements.

The SRA said in its warning notice: “Evidence of both the above issues have been identified through high-profile court cases. For example, R (on the application of Ayinde) v Haringey LBC [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin)) highlighted that AI-generated case citations that turned out to be false were submitted to court, drawing public attention to the risks of using unverified AI outputs in submissions.

“In relation to client confidentiality, in UK v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] UKUT 81 (IAC), the Upper Tribunal commented on the potential for the use of public AI tools to breach confidentiality and legal professional privilege.

“We are concerned that some of those operating in the regulated legal sector are not fulfilling their obligations to uphold their duties to the courts, clients and third parties, and are not always following all relevant rules and regulations.”

The regulator noted there are a number of ongoing investigations relating to misuse of AI, including on issues relating to inaccurate legal citations, supervision and confidentiality.

SRA Executive Director Strategy and Policy, Aileen Armstrong said: “AI is already benefiting consumers and legal professionals, and we are increasingly seeing firms use it in innovative ways to improve services and efficiency. However, the use of AI does not change the professional standards expected of solicitors and law firms. 

“Firms and solicitors must have appropriate oversight and controls in place to make sure consumers are receiving high-quality legal services and that our standards are met. Individuals remain responsible for the work they produce and the advice they provide, regardless of whether AI is used, or not.”

The SRA added further sections to its guidance on effective supervision relating to AIguidance on effective supervision relating to AI in June this year.

Responding to the notice, Law Society of England and Wales vice president, Brett Dixon, said: “The Law Society recognises that AI should be used to support and enhance legal practice, not to replace the essential role of solicitors in providing trusted advice to clients.

"We welcome the SRA’s warning notice and the clarity the guidance provides around how the use of AI interacts with the provision of legal services by solicitors, particularly in relation to the courts and the protection of client confidentiality.

"As a regulated profession, solicitors have the responsibility to act in the best interests of their client, which includes using AI and other technologies responsibly. The warning notice is a reminder of how this should be applied in practice."

Dixon added: "Technological innovation in legal processes and service delivery is advancing at speed. As the use of AI evolves rapidly, the SRA will need to continue providing the profession with swift and clear guidance so solicitors can use AI with confidence in line with their duties.

“We look forward to continuing our engagement with the SRA to help solicitors navigate this everchanging landscape.”

Also in this section

Aug 03, 2026

NHS England to revise Palantir platform metrics after FOI request reveals internal doubts

NHS England is to change the methodology behind two of its most widely cited claims about the Palantir-built Federated Data Platform, after internal emails disclosed under a freedom of information request showed the health service's own analysts had questioned the validity of the baseline used to measure the system's success, the Financial Times has reported.
Jul 22, 2026

AI in education: the importance of transparency

The debate around AI in education often focuses on capability. What can it do? How much time can it save? Yet some of the most important questions are not technical at all. Adam Halsey looks at why transparency should come before implementation.
Jul 14, 2026

Government to legislate for AI use in criminal disclosure

The Home Office is to allow police officers to use artificial intelligence to review and summarise evidence for the first time, in reforms the department said would free up officer time and deliver swifter justice for victims.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800