Info Gov

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has published new guidance to support public authorities dealing with a rise in AI-generated Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and increasingly complex cases.

The ICO said the guidance is in response to public authorities that say they are also seeing requests that misquote legislation or require significant clarification before they can be processed.

According to the document, the trend has seen FOI requests that are “very long, repetitive and contain unrelated comments or misdirected demands”, while having a greater scope.

It also noted that the requests are sometimes written in a way which makes it harder to identify the information being requested.

To help tackle this, the document includes guidance on requests that are generated using AI that misinterpret or misquote FOI legislation; managing higher volumes of requests that require clarification or refinement; and maintaining fair and consistent handling of requests, regardless of how they are created.

It also includes examples of practical wording public authorities can use to encourage responsible use of AI by requesters and support clearer, more effective FOI requests.

Deborah Clark, Upstream Regulation Manager at the Information Commissioner’s Office, said that FOI practitioners have told the ICO that AI-generated requests are "changing the day-to-day reality of their work".

She added: "This guidance is about giving teams practical, sensible support, not adding new burdens. It does not change the law or create new requirements, instead it helps teams apply existing FOI principles consistently, regardless of how a request is created.

"Used responsibly, AI also has the potential to help public authorities improve how they handle FOI requests, and this guidance sits alongside our wider work to support innovation that delivers real benefits for organisations and the public."

Clark said the ICO's aim is to support and maintain effective access to information for everyone, while making sure FOI services remain workable and resilient as technology continues to evolve.

Also in this section

May 15, 2026

Getting the timing right

The date for assessing whether a request is vexatious or manifestly unreasonable, in the context of freedom of information and environmental information refusal decisions, is an issue with a surprisingly long tail - particularly given its practical importance to public bodies when faced with information rights requests.
May 12, 2026

Tribunal dismisses appeal for audio recording of police misconduct hearing

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed a Freedom of Information appeal seeking disclosure of an audio recording of a Metropolitan Police misconduct hearing, finding that the detailed outcome report already published was sufficient to meet the legitimate interest in transparency.
May 12, 2026

Councils not required to publish full planning application forms on statutory register

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal seeking unredacted disclosure of a planning application form, finding that local planning authorities are not legally obliged to place the entirety of such forms - including personal contact details and owner names - on the statutory planning register.
Apr 29, 2026

English Heritage loses appeal over Charlie Chaplin blue plaque research

The First-tier Tribunal has ruled that English Heritage must disclose internal historical research into Charlie Chaplin's suitability for a blue plaque, rejecting arguments that their release would harm the charity's commercial interests or create a chilling effect on its historians.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800