Info Gov

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has published new guidance to support public authorities dealing with a rise in AI-generated Freedom of Information (FOI) requests and increasingly complex cases.

The ICO said the guidance is in response to public authorities that say they are also seeing requests that misquote legislation or require significant clarification before they can be processed.

According to the document, the trend has seen FOI requests that are “very long, repetitive and contain unrelated comments or misdirected demands”, while having a greater scope.

It also noted that the requests are sometimes written in a way which makes it harder to identify the information being requested.

To help tackle this, the document includes guidance on requests that are generated using AI that misinterpret or misquote FOI legislation; managing higher volumes of requests that require clarification or refinement; and maintaining fair and consistent handling of requests, regardless of how they are created.

It also includes examples of practical wording public authorities can use to encourage responsible use of AI by requesters and support clearer, more effective FOI requests.

Deborah Clark, Upstream Regulation Manager at the Information Commissioner’s Office, said that FOI practitioners have told the ICO that AI-generated requests are "changing the day-to-day reality of their work".

She added: "This guidance is about giving teams practical, sensible support, not adding new burdens. It does not change the law or create new requirements, instead it helps teams apply existing FOI principles consistently, regardless of how a request is created.

"Used responsibly, AI also has the potential to help public authorities improve how they handle FOI requests, and this guidance sits alongside our wider work to support innovation that delivers real benefits for organisations and the public."

Clark said the ICO's aim is to support and maintain effective access to information for everyone, while making sure FOI services remain workable and resilient as technology continues to evolve.

Also in this section

Sep 23, 2026

Redacted rights: When does Article 10 ECHR confer a right to information?

A three-judge panel of the Upper Tribunal (Lady Poole, UTJ Citron and UTJ Brewer) in Cruelty Free International v Information Commissioner & Home Office [2026] UKUT 328 (AAC) has held that Article 10 ECHR can, in narrow circumstances, confer a right to receive information from a public authority - but that this particular Appellant still cannot have any. Georgina Pein analyses the ruling.
Sep 22, 2026

Tribunal blasts ICO for deciding EIR complaint without seeing withheld information

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against an Information Commissioner decision that a council's correspondence with a local newspaper about a resident was the resident's own personal data, but has criticised the Commissioner for reaching that decision without seeing the withheld information or engaging with the council, an approach it said caused months of delay and unnecessary cost.
Sep 18, 2026

Sector-wide hostility not enough for section 38(2) NCND "endangering effect" exemption

The Home Office was not entitled to neither confirm nor deny whether it held audit records for the Envigo RMS Belton animal research facility, the First-tier Tribunal has ruled, finding that evidence of a hostile environment around animal research did not establish the causal link to endangerment that section 38(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal upholds NI Prison Service refusal to reveal body scanner hit rate despite "wider public interest"

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against the Northern Ireland Prison Service's (NIPS) refusal to disclose how many X-ray body scans of prisoners produced a positive indication and how many led to the recovery of contraband, finding that the figures would be likely to prejudice the prevention of crime and the maintenance of prison security under section 31 of the Freedom of…
Sep 14, 2026

Ofqual overturns ICO order to disclose braille exam error notifications by consent

The Information Commissioner has conceded a First-tier Tribunal appeal by Ofqual and agreed that event notifications submitted by exam boards about errors in braille versions of GCSE and A level papers can be withheld under section 31(1)(g) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, reversing a decision notice in which he had rejected the exemption and ordered disclosure.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal overturns "manifestly unreasonable" refusal after council's email tally falls apart

The First-tier Tribunal has ordered North Tyneside Council to respond afresh to a request for records about a school boundary fence after finding the council was not entitled to refuse it as manifestly unreasonable under regulation 12(4)(b) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, and that the evidence it relied on to show a burdensome course of dealings did not bear scrutiny.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800