Info Gov

The Scottish Information Commissioner has introduced a new case management measure to protect the integrity of the FOI appeals process from the impact of high-volume, machine-generated requests driven by artificial intelligence tools.

The measure will give Commissioner David Hamilton the ability to restrict the number of FOI appeals from an individual requester under live investigation to five, in circumstances where it is deemed appropriate to do so.

The Commissioner has been careful to stress the targeted nature of the policy. It will not be applied generally to all individuals who have more than five active appeals at any one time, but is specifically intended for use where there is evidence that a pattern of submissions is likely to have a negative impact on the functioning of Scotland's FOI regime as a whole.

The trigger for the new policy is a sharp rise in appeals volumes. The number of appeals made to the Commissioner increased by 83% over the last year, from 593 in 2024–25 to 1,084 in 2025–26. This included a two-month period in which 120 appeals were received from just two applicants, with evidence that those appeals had been generated entirely through AI. Those cases were subsequently closed before reaching investigation.

Where implemented, additional cases from the same requester would be held back and not progressed until existing live cases were resolved. Commissioner staff would work with applicants to prioritise the cases most important to them.

The measure does not prevent requesters from submitting further appeals, nor does it guarantee that held-back cases will go uninvestigated. It is described as discretionary and will be applied on a case-by-case basis. It has not yet been used.

The Scottish ICO said that public polling commissioned by the office found significant support for some form of controls: 85% of respondents with a view expressed support for measures to address high-volume AI requests. The policy was advised to the Scottish Parliament in January and shared with stakeholders at the Scottish Public Information Forum on 8 June 2026, where it received general support.

Commissioner Hamilton said: "This new defensive measure will not be used lightly, but it is available to be used in circumstances where it is necessary to protect the integrity of our FOI regime. As evidence of an increase in machine generated requests and appeals grows, it is vital to ensure that the FOI rights of others are not exploited or harmed by a proliferation of automated requests."

He added that the challenge was not unique to his office: "I am not the only regulator, nor the only public service, which is experiencing such challenges. I think the time is right for a national conversation about the impact of machine-generated AI activity on our public services."

The Commissioner is also preparing a guide to the effective use of AI when making FOI requests, due to be published shortly. The new measure will be incorporated into a forthcoming version of the office's Investigation Handbook.

The development follows wider concern about AI's growing influence on FOI demand across the UK. Recent polling by the UK Information Commissioner's Office estimated that around one eighth of recent requests made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 had been suggested by AI tools.

Also in this section

Sep 23, 2026

Redacted rights: When does Article 10 ECHR confer a right to information?

A three-judge panel of the Upper Tribunal (Lady Poole, UTJ Citron and UTJ Brewer) in Cruelty Free International v Information Commissioner & Home Office [2026] UKUT 328 (AAC) has held that Article 10 ECHR can, in narrow circumstances, confer a right to receive information from a public authority - but that this particular Appellant still cannot have any. Georgina Pein analyses the ruling.
Sep 22, 2026

Tribunal blasts ICO for deciding EIR complaint without seeing withheld information

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against an Information Commissioner decision that a council's correspondence with a local newspaper about a resident was the resident's own personal data, but has criticised the Commissioner for reaching that decision without seeing the withheld information or engaging with the council, an approach it said caused months of delay and unnecessary cost.
Sep 18, 2026

Sector-wide hostility not enough for section 38(2) NCND "endangering effect" exemption

The Home Office was not entitled to neither confirm nor deny whether it held audit records for the Envigo RMS Belton animal research facility, the First-tier Tribunal has ruled, finding that evidence of a hostile environment around animal research did not establish the causal link to endangerment that section 38(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal upholds NI Prison Service refusal to reveal body scanner hit rate despite "wider public interest"

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against the Northern Ireland Prison Service's (NIPS) refusal to disclose how many X-ray body scans of prisoners produced a positive indication and how many led to the recovery of contraband, finding that the figures would be likely to prejudice the prevention of crime and the maintenance of prison security under section 31 of the Freedom of…
Sep 14, 2026

Ofqual overturns ICO order to disclose braille exam error notifications by consent

The Information Commissioner has conceded a First-tier Tribunal appeal by Ofqual and agreed that event notifications submitted by exam boards about errors in braille versions of GCSE and A level papers can be withheld under section 31(1)(g) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, reversing a decision notice in which he had rejected the exemption and ordered disclosure.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal overturns "manifestly unreasonable" refusal after council's email tally falls apart

The First-tier Tribunal has ordered North Tyneside Council to respond afresh to a request for records about a school boundary fence after finding the council was not entitled to refuse it as manifestly unreasonable under regulation 12(4)(b) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, and that the evidence it relied on to show a burdensome course of dealings did not bear scrutiny.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800