Info Gov

From 19 June 2026, all organisations acting as data controllers are required to have in place an effective process to enable individuals to raise complaints about how their personal data is handled. Ashleigh Dibb looks at what this will mean in practice.

Complaints shutterstock 269047922

The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (DUAA) introduces an important obligation for organisations handling personal data. Organisations will be required to ensure that individuals can easily raise concerns, and that those concerns are properly acknowledged and addressed within appropriate timeframes.

Organisations with existing complaints procedures should not assume these will be sufficient. A thorough review of any existing policies will be necessary to ensure current processes meet the standards set by the DUAA.

Where no suitable procedures currently exists, organisations will need to create and implement a compliant procedure well in advance of the June 2026 deadline.

Documentation and transparency

While the DUAA does not expressly mandate a standalone written complaints policy, in practice organisations will be expected to document their procedures. This reflects the broader accountability principle under UK data protection law and will be important in demonstrating compliance.

Organisations should also consider:

  • updating privacy notices to clearly inform individuals of their right to complain and how to do so;
  • ensuring internal policies accurately reflect the complaints handling process; and
  • maintaining appropriate records of complaints received and how they have been managed.

Contracts with third parties

Where processing activities are outsourced to third party service providers, contractual arrangements with these sub processors should be reviewed to ensure they adequately address complaints handling. In particular, agreements should:

  • require processors to promptly notify the controller of any data protection complaint they receive; and
  • oblige processors to provide reasonable assistance in investigating and resolving complaints.

This is essential to ensure controllers remain able to meet their legal obligations, even where processing is carried out on their behalf.

Staff training and awareness

The effectiveness of any complaints process will depend on staff understanding their responsibilities. It is therefore imperative that organisations:

  • clearly identify who is responsible for handling data protection complaints;
  • ensure all staff can recognise a data protection complaint, even where it is not expressly labelled as such; and
  • provide clear internal guidance on escalation procedures.

Training on complaints handling should form part of wider data protection training programmes and be reviewed regularly.

Ashleigh Dibb is a solicitor in the Commercial team at Forbes Solicitors

Also in this section

May 26, 2026

Key Data Protection Issues for Automated Recruitment in the Public Sector

The need to recruit faster in a competitive market, the need to minimise costs in the recruitment process, and the need to secure the best candidate quickly, makes the use of AI an appealing option for any employer including public bodies. But there are pitfalls for the unwary write David Leach and Charlotte Smith.
May 08, 2026

Schools warned over AI blackmail threat as guidance urges rethink on pupil images

Schools across the UK are being urged to review or remove identifiable photographs of pupils from their websites and social media accounts, following warnings that criminals are using artificial intelligence tools to manipulate those images into child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and then threaten to release it unless a ransom is paid.
Apr 28, 2026

AI in Education: Why Data Protection Must Come First

Artificial Intelligence promises a lot. It can undoubtedly do amazing things. But secretly (or maybe not so secretly), it also makes us slightly nervous. Adam Halsey looks at what this means for schools, and why data protection needs to sit at the centre of any decision to use AI.
Apr 17, 2026

When data protection doesn’t protect you

Recently, the Information Commissioner’s Office published the outcome of a criminal prosecution. The title? Just two names: Christopher Munro and William Chipoma. No explanation. No softening. No anonymity. And that, in itself, is a powerful lesson in how data protection law really works.
Mar 27, 2026

Tribunal strikes out s.166 DPA 2018 application over medical records dispute

The First‑tier Tribunal has rejected a complaint against the Information Commissioner (ICO), deeming that an application under section 166 Data Protection Act 2018 against an ICO finding was seeking a ruling on the substantive merits of a complaint when s166 should only be applied to procedural defects in an ICO investigation.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800