Info Gov

The personal details of 2,900 voters have been leaked by Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council, in what it has described as an “administrative error”.

The Warwickshire council admitted the breach and said the incident has been discussed with the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and advice taken to avoid any repeat.

On 27 July, an email was sent to electors who had provided their emails to the Council’s Elections team, inviting them to check the information held for their property and confirm or update those details.

This was sent for the purpose of updating the electoral register - known as the annual canvass.

However, due to an administrative error, the email contained a link that revealed the recipients’ forenames, surnames, email addresses, and household-specific unique code.

The council noted that the unique code alone cannot be used to access electoral registration information, as additional information is required to activate and use the service.

The council added that it takes residents' personal information security “extremely seriously” and that a review will be undertaken.

Tom Shardlow, Chief Executive at Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council, said: “The Council is required to update the electoral register periodically, and it is clear that, on this occasion, an unfortunate human error occurred during that process.

“I am disappointed that this error has happened and would like to offer my sincere apologies to those residents who have been affected and may be concerned by this incident. I am confident that this is an isolated incident.

“[…] I am reassured that, as soon as the issue was identified, officers acted swiftly to contain it, investigate the cause, and contact those affected. The Council has also reported the matter to the Information Commissioner's Office and followed the advice provided.

“A thorough review is now underway to understand exactly how this error occurred and, most importantly, to identify any additional safeguards needed to prevent a similar incident from happening again.

“While we recognise that this breach will understandably cause concern for some residents, we would like to reassure the public that the issue has been contained and that protecting residents’ information remains a priority for the Council.”

Also in this section

Jul 30, 2026

Section 166 application succeeds as tribunal finds ICO left complaints unresolved

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has ordered the Information Commissioner to take further steps and issue a written outcome on a data protection complaint after finding that the regulator invited the complainant to return if dissatisfied with the department's response, received her further material but then did not demonstrate that it had concluded the complaints.
Jul 29, 2026

Regulators clarify medical device status and governance expectations for NHS AI scribes

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has published new guidance to clarify how existing medical device law applies to ambient voice technology (AVT) products used in health and care settings in Great Britain, setting a regulatory line between tools that merely transcribe and summarise clinical conversations and those that go further into diagnosis or automated action.
Jul 22, 2026

Publication of judgments in care proceedings

A High Court judge in the Family Division recently considered the question of the extent to which judgments he had handed down should be anonymised and whether the transparency order in force in respect of care proceedings should be varied accordingly. Molly Giles considers the key points from the ruling.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800