Info Gov

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued Derby City Council with an enforcement notice after evidence showed “widespread and persistent delays” in the local authority’s handling of freedom of information requests, with some outstanding requests dating back to 2022.

The Commissioner became aware of concerns regarding the council's compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) following information provided about the council's timeliness in responding to FOI requests and the scale of its outstanding caseload.

The council provided information about its performance for FOI requests due between 1 January 2026 and 24 July 2026.

Of those requests, 226 were completed on time, representing 29% of the total; 90 were completed outside the statutory timeframe, representing 11%; and 463 were open and overdue, representing 59%.

The council also provided a spreadsheet setting out individual outstanding FOI requests.

The Commissioner found the oldest recorded request was received on 24 October 2022 and had a request deadline of 21 November 2022.

Outlining its reasons for the enforcement notice, the ICO said: “FOIA requires a public authority to inform applicants whether it holds requested information and, if it does, to communicate that information within 20 working days of receipt, unless a valid exemption or other FOIA provision applies.

“The Commissioner is satisfied that the council has failed to consistently comply with these obligations. The information provided by the council demonstrates a substantial and sustained backlog of open and overdue FOI requests.”

The ICO considered that the figures indicated “more than isolated instances of delay”.

It said: “The number and age of outstanding requests demonstrate systemic weaknesses in the council's request-handling arrangements. Those weaknesses have resulted in persistent non-compliance with the statutory timescales imposed by FOIA and have the potential to undermine the rights conferred on applicants by section 1(1).”

The ICO warned that while operational pressures, staffing constraints, service dependencies or clearance arrangements may explain how a backlog has arisen, they do not remove a council's statutory obligations.

As a result of the investigation, Derby City Council was issued with an Enforcement Notice requiring it to comply with section 1(1) FOIA in respect of the “substantial backlog” of overdue requests, and to ensure that future requests are handled in accordance with the council's obligations under sections 1(1) and 10(1) FOIA.

The council was also ordered to devise and publish an action plan, supported by a “lessons learned exercise”.

The ICO said: “The action plan should examine the root cause of delay from receipt and validation through allocation, service input, drafting, approval and issue, with specific mitigations for recurring problems addressed in the plan.”

A spokesperson for Derby City Council said: “The Council acknowledges the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) decision to take enforcement action because of delays in responding to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. We accept that our performance has fallen below the required standards and we apologise to those affected.

“This issue stems from a shortfall in capacity alongside rising demand and a growing backlog of requests. Prior to the ICO’s intervention, we had already identified these challenges and begun taking action to resolve them.

“A comprehensive Improvement Action Plan is now in place – we have secured extra resources to increase capacity, senior leadership is actively involved and tracking progress, and our governance and performance monitoring arrangements have been strengthened.

“Building on our past track record of strong performance, we are taking all necessary steps to restore performance and secure sustainable compliance moving forward.”

Also in this section

Sep 23, 2026

Redacted rights: When does Article 10 ECHR confer a right to information?

A three-judge panel of the Upper Tribunal (Lady Poole, UTJ Citron and UTJ Brewer) in Cruelty Free International v Information Commissioner & Home Office [2026] UKUT 328 (AAC) has held that Article 10 ECHR can, in narrow circumstances, confer a right to receive information from a public authority - but that this particular Appellant still cannot have any. Georgina Pein analyses the ruling.
Sep 22, 2026

Tribunal blasts ICO for deciding EIR complaint without seeing withheld information

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against an Information Commissioner decision that a council's correspondence with a local newspaper about a resident was the resident's own personal data, but has criticised the Commissioner for reaching that decision without seeing the withheld information or engaging with the council, an approach it said caused months of delay and unnecessary cost.
Sep 18, 2026

Sector-wide hostility not enough for section 38(2) NCND "endangering effect" exemption

The Home Office was not entitled to neither confirm nor deny whether it held audit records for the Envigo RMS Belton animal research facility, the First-tier Tribunal has ruled, finding that evidence of a hostile environment around animal research did not establish the causal link to endangerment that section 38(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal upholds NI Prison Service refusal to reveal body scanner hit rate despite "wider public interest"

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against the Northern Ireland Prison Service's (NIPS) refusal to disclose how many X-ray body scans of prisoners produced a positive indication and how many led to the recovery of contraband, finding that the figures would be likely to prejudice the prevention of crime and the maintenance of prison security under section 31 of the Freedom of…
Sep 14, 2026

Ofqual overturns ICO order to disclose braille exam error notifications by consent

The Information Commissioner has conceded a First-tier Tribunal appeal by Ofqual and agreed that event notifications submitted by exam boards about errors in braille versions of GCSE and A level papers can be withheld under section 31(1)(g) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, reversing a decision notice in which he had rejected the exemption and ordered disclosure.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal overturns "manifestly unreasonable" refusal after council's email tally falls apart

The First-tier Tribunal has ordered North Tyneside Council to respond afresh to a request for records about a school boundary fence after finding the council was not entitled to refuse it as manifestly unreasonable under regulation 12(4)(b) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, and that the evidence it relied on to show a burdensome course of dealings did not bear scrutiny.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800