Info Gov

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has called for “urgent improvements” across UK local authorities after finding that people trying to access their own care records are being “let down”.

The ICO warned that people are facing “systemic and demoralising challenges” when it comes to their care records, finding that over two thirds (71%) of people struggled with poor communication from the local authority, and 69% said the process took longer than expected – with one person still waiting 16 years later.  

Meanwhile, when care records were received, over half (59%) did not receive enough information and nearly nine in 10 (89%) were left with questions or concerns.  

In light of its research, the ICO has today (9 December) launched a ‘Better Records Together’ campaign, which includes:  

  • new standards for organisations on handling requests with care, as well as good practice measures to better support people from the moment they enter the care system; 
  • advice for people requesting their records to help them to navigate the process and access support;  
  • UK-wide supervision pilot running across 2025/26, monitoring the performance of 19 organisations to drive improvements. 

Meanwhile, the ICO has written to senior leaders to demand change in how requests for care records are handled. Organisations have been urged to:  

  • implement the measures in the ICO’s new standards as a priority – “front line staff must understand how to handle requests with care and communicate with empathy”; 
  • put sufficient resources in place – “ensure organisations can manage the volume and complexity of requests without delay and further harm”;  
  • invest at the very start of the care records lifecycle – “build records with good practice and people’s rights in mind to reduce future challenges”.  

The letter is clear that if improvements are not made, organisations may face regulatory action.

John Edwards, Information Commissioner, said: “This is so much more than a request for personal information. These are people fighting to access their own biography – their own identity – that is in the custody of an organisation. It is a brave and emotional step. But these requests are too often met with cold bureaucracy, long delays and pages of unexplained redactions, which can have devastating consequences.  

“This current picture is unacceptable - but there are many people who play a role in creating better records and better access. As the data protection regulator, we can bring clarity to how these roles work together to thread people’s stories. We can build a clear pathway by ensuring everyone has the tools they need – equipping organisations with the certainty and skills to handle requests with care and compassion, and empowering people with the confidence and support to advocate for their own rights.”

He added: “Real change must come from the top - so today I am calling on local authority leaders across the UK to take urgent action. Improving this process starts at the beginning – when a child enters the care system, their information should be recorded with their rights in mind, knowing that they may request it later. This will reduce the administrative burden and keep the person at the very heart of the process, so future generations do not face the same struggle.”   

Responding to the announcement, Cllr Amanda Hopgood, Chair of the Local Government Association’s Children, Young People and Families Committee, said: “Councils want to ensure people have access to their care records without delay and to be able to move more quickly on releasing records. 

“However many councils lack the resource to do so, as a result of historic funding pressures. There is also the additional challenge of older records being generally paper-based, so this can require more work and take longer.”

Augusta Itua, Legal Consultant at CoramBAAF, said: "The ICO’s Better Records Together campaign represents an important step towards improving the experiences and outcomes for care experienced people seeking access to the information about their life and family history held within children’s social care files. By aligning with the standards and expectations set by the ICO, and drawing on the materials developed through the campaign, we hope that the process will become more person-centred and trauma-informed and better prioritise the rights and needs of care experienced people. We look forward to supporting our members in navigating the changes and contributing further to this important initiative.”

Lottie Winson

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800