Info Gov

The Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) has launched a 12-week consultation on revisions to the Transparency, Influence and Accountability standard (TI&A standard), the Consumer Standards Code of Practice, and the Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSMs).

The RSH said the consultation is aimed at ensuring that directions the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has given are accurately reflected in its TI&A standard.

The Competence and Conduct requirements are aimed at driving greater professionalism and higher standards by ensuring relevant housing staff are able to deliver a high standard of service to tenants.

Senior housing managers and executives will also be required to hold, or be working towards, a housing management qualification, the RSH noted.

The STAIRs requirements will give tenants of private registered providers (PRPs) a similar level of access to information relating to the management of social housing that local authority tenants already have.

PRPs will have to proactively publish certain information about their activities that is set out in the government’s policy statement, and tenants will be able to formally request relevant information and receive timely responses.

The consultation also sets out how the Regulator proposes to implement a new TSM covering electrical safety checks.

RSH Chief Executive Fiona MacGregor said: “The proposed changes to our standards we are consulting on will enable the sector to further improve outcomes for social housing tenants and deliver good services.

“All the changes being consulted on are intended to enhance the transparency and accountability of landlords to their tenants.”

The consultation runs until 3 March 2026.

Interested parties can respond to RSH’s consultation here.

Harry Rodd

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800