Info Gov

The Government has launched an independent review into the use of non-corporate communication channels (NCCCs) - such as WhatsApp and personal email accounts -  by officials, advisers and ministers.

The Cabinet Office said the review will define what constitutes an NCCC in the context of government business, examine the use of disappearing messages and other auto-delete features, and identify the security risks associated with these communication channels.

Professor Sir Anthony Finkelstein has been appointed to lead the review, which is expected to issue a report and make practical recommendations to the Government in early 2027.

The Government will eventually publish the findings and present its response to Parliament "in due course", according to the Cabinet Office.

Announcing the review, the Cabinet Office said: "In recent years, the way we all communicate has changed considerably, including across the public sector.

"The Government recognises there is a need for greater clarity over the use of non-corporate communication channels (NCCCs), such as personal messaging apps and email accounts, to ensure government business remains secure and decisions are recorded appropriately.

"It is important that we strike the right balance between transparency and accountability, while maintaining operational efficiency and information security."

An The Information Commissioner's Office welcomed the development. An ICO spokesperson said:

"We welcome the government’s decision to launch this review and stand ready to contribute our expertise and insight to help ensure a thorough and transparent process. This is a measure we have advocated for repeatedly, including in a report we laid before Parliament, and we are pleased to see it moving forward.

"Society benefits when public services earn trust through transparency and fairness. We encourage a comprehensive assessment that builds trust and confidence in the way non-corporate communications channels are used by government."

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800