Info Gov

The Government is considering significant restrictions on Freedom of Information (FOI) rights after the local government elections in May, according to a report in the Times newspaper.

Citing government sources, the newspaper reported that the government is exploring ways to limit the scope of FOI requests, citing the alleged security threat posed by China and the financial cost of administering the system.

The government does not keep figures for the costs of complying with the FOI regime although the number of requests made to central government departments in 2024 reached a new record of 83,041.

Transparency campaigners, however, warned that the true cost of such reforms would fall on democratic accountability, undermining mechanisms that allow journalists, campaigners and members of the public to scrutinise government decisions, public spending and institutional failures.

The Times also highlighted the role that FOI has played in exposing long‑term public controversies including major scandals such as those involving the Post Office and infected blood and suggested that reducing access to information could make similar abuses harder to detect.

The paper also noted that claims that existing legislation already contains extensive exemptions: the security services, GCHQ, and the National Crime Agency are entirely outside the FOI regime, and the law also protects against the “mosaic effect”, where isolated disclosures could be pieced together to reveal sensitive intelligence.

Cabinet Office spokesperson told InfoGov: "We do not comment on speculation or security matters. We publish more information than ever before and have increased transparency requirements and standards, including areas like ministerial declarations.". 

According to the Cabinet Office, in 2024 there were 83,041 FOI requests received across all monitored bodies, an increase of 12,566 (+18%) from 2023 and the largest number of requests during a year since monitoring began in 2005, when there were 38,108 FOI requests in total.

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800