Info Gov

The Housing Ombudsman has launched a public consultation on how it will handle complaints under the new Social Tenant Access to Information Requirements (STAIRs), a reform giving millions of tenants of Private Registered Providers (PRPs) - mainly housing associations - stronger rights to request information about how their homes are managed.


The Housing Ombudsman Service has begun seeking views on its proposed approach to investigating complaints made under STAIRs, a new legal framework that grants tenants of ** the right to access information about the management of their homes.

Local authority tenants are not covered by the new requirements as councils already fall under the Freedom of Information Act.

The consultation (https://www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk/app/uploads/2026/01/Social-Tenant-Access-to-Information-Requirements-STAIRs-consultation.pdf), published on 20 January 2026, invites responses from PRPs, tenants, and anyone with an interest in social housing across England. It runs until 17 March 2026.

The government confirmed in September 2025 that the Housing Ombudsman would act as the official complaints body for STAIRs. The Ombudsman has since updated its Scheme to reflect this new responsibility.

Under STAIRs:
- Tenants can request information about decisions and activities affecting their homes, communities, or landlords.
- PRPs must meet new transparency obligations.
- The Ombudsman will investigate complaints where tenants believe information has been wrongly withheld.

The Ombudsman is asking for feedback on:
- Who is eligible to complain under STAIRs
- Whether the proposed time limits for complaints are fair
- Whether the planned investigation approach will deliver fair and consistent outcomes

“An opportunity to rebuild trust”
Housing Ombudsman Richard Blakeway said the reforms could help rebuild confidence between tenants and landlords at a time when trust is low.

“Trust and transparency are vital for a positive landlord‑tenant relationship… At a time when trust is low, this is an opportunity for PRPs to turn this tide.”

He encouraged tenants and landlords to take part, saying their feedback would help shape a fair and effective system.

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800