Info Gov

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a formal information notice to the London Borough of Croydon after the authority failed to justify its refusal to disclose material requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).

The notice, dated 19 February 2026, requires the council to provide the ICO with a substantive response to a letter sent on 22 January 2026. The Commissioner is investigating whether Croydon handled an FOI request submitted on 14 April 2025 in accordance with Part I of FOIA.

According to the notice, *“the Commissioner wrote to the council on 22 January 2026 requesting its justification for refusing to provide some of the information requested by the complainant.”* The authority did not supply the required explanation, prompting the statutory intervention.

Using powers under section 51 FOIA, the ICO has ordered Croydon to furnish a full response within 30 calendar days. The notice specifies that the council must provide “a substantive response to the Commissioner’s letter of 22 January 2025 (fresh copy attached).”

Failure to comply could result in the Commissioner certifying the matter to the High Court, where it may be treated as contempt of court under section 54 FOIA.

Croydon has a right of appeal to the First‑tier Tribunal (Information Rights) within 28 days. Appeals submitted late will only be accepted where the Tribunal considers there are “special circumstances.”

The notice was signed by Senior Case Officer Esi Mensah and issued from the ICO’s Wilmslow headquarters.

The case adds to a growing number of FOIA compliance interventions across local government, as the ICO continues to emphasise timeliness, transparency and statutory accountability in public authorities’ handling of information rights requests.

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800