Info Gov

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a formal information notice to the London Borough of Croydon after the authority failed to justify its refusal to disclose material requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).

The notice, dated 19 February 2026, requires the council to provide the ICO with a substantive response to a letter sent on 22 January 2026. The Commissioner is investigating whether Croydon handled an FOI request submitted on 14 April 2025 in accordance with Part I of FOIA.

According to the notice, *“the Commissioner wrote to the council on 22 January 2026 requesting its justification for refusing to provide some of the information requested by the complainant.”* The authority did not supply the required explanation, prompting the statutory intervention.

Using powers under section 51 FOIA, the ICO has ordered Croydon to furnish a full response within 30 calendar days. The notice specifies that the council must provide “a substantive response to the Commissioner’s letter of 22 January 2025 (fresh copy attached).”

Failure to comply could result in the Commissioner certifying the matter to the High Court, where it may be treated as contempt of court under section 54 FOIA.

Croydon has a right of appeal to the First‑tier Tribunal (Information Rights) within 28 days. Appeals submitted late will only be accepted where the Tribunal considers there are “special circumstances.”

The notice was signed by Senior Case Officer Esi Mensah and issued from the ICO’s Wilmslow headquarters.

The case adds to a growing number of FOIA compliance interventions across local government, as the ICO continues to emphasise timeliness, transparency and statutory accountability in public authorities’ handling of information rights requests.

Also in this section

May 15, 2026

Getting the timing right

The date for assessing whether a request is vexatious or manifestly unreasonable, in the context of freedom of information and environmental information refusal decisions, is an issue with a surprisingly long tail - particularly given its practical importance to public bodies when faced with information rights requests.
May 12, 2026

Tribunal dismisses appeal for audio recording of police misconduct hearing

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed a Freedom of Information appeal seeking disclosure of an audio recording of a Metropolitan Police misconduct hearing, finding that the detailed outcome report already published was sufficient to meet the legitimate interest in transparency.
May 12, 2026

Councils not required to publish full planning application forms on statutory register

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal seeking unredacted disclosure of a planning application form, finding that local planning authorities are not legally obliged to place the entirety of such forms - including personal contact details and owner names - on the statutory planning register.
Apr 29, 2026

English Heritage loses appeal over Charlie Chaplin blue plaque research

The First-tier Tribunal has ruled that English Heritage must disclose internal historical research into Charlie Chaplin's suitability for a blue plaque, rejecting arguments that their release would harm the charity's commercial interests or create a chilling effect on its historians.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800