Info Gov

The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has been served with a formal Enforcement Notice by the Information Commissioner for the second time in two years after continued failures to meet statutory deadlines under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).

The Information Commissioner’s notice, issued under section 52 FOIA, follows the MPS’s persistent inability to meet the requirement of the FOIA to respond to information requests within 20 working days (section 10(1) FOIA).

According to the ICO, the MPS ended 2025 with a compliance rate of 69.44%, marginally improving to 70.81% by mid‑February 2026. The Commissioner notes that the MPS has never exceeded 75.9% compliance since FOIA came into force in 2005. This falls short of the Commissioner’s required minimum 90% “in‑time” compliance rate.

Although the force has reduced its backlog significantly over the past year, overall timeliness remains well below the legally expected standard. This notice follows an earlier Enforcement Notice issued in May 2024, which required the force to clear a backlog of 362 overdue FOI cases and publish an action plan.

Although the MPS complied with that notice, performance did not improve sustainably. Monitoring throughout 2025 showed compliance remained “below 70%”, despite the introduction of new forecasting tools, process improvements, and the recruitment of additional staff. The force continues to face fluctuating monthly demand- ranging from 530 requests in June 2025 to 728 in October 2025, as well as increased request volumes over several years.

The Commissioner emphasised that the MPS’s compliance remains “far removed” from both statutory requirements and the minimum standards set out in the ICO’s Timeliness Toolkit.

The Commissioner’s key concerns included over 100 overdue cases as of 13 February 2026, an inability to commit to achieving 90% compliance within any timeframe and the MPS’s historical non‑compliance dating back to 2005.

The Enforcement Notice set out three mandatory steps, with deadlines, that the MPS must achieve:

By 1 October 2026: No FOI requests open more than 20 working days beyond receipt, excluding those with valid public interest extensions.

By 1 April 2027: Achieve an average 90% “in‑time” compliance rate across January–March 2027.

By 1 October 2027: Achieve a minimum 90% monthly compliance rate from April–September 2027.

Failure to comply allows the Commissioner to certify the matter to the High Court, where the MPS could be treated as if in contempt of court. The MPS may appeal to the First‑tier Tribunal (Information Rights) within 28 days.

A spokesperson for the Met said: "The ICO rightly acknowledges the hard work of Met staff for the improvements made so far.

"We take our FOIA obligations seriously and we are investing in new technologies to help reduce the burden on staff and improve performance.

"We are engaging with the ICO to discuss these challenges, against the backdrop of tough choices we have made to plug a £260million funding gap, while protecting frontline policing and keeping communities safe."

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800