Info Gov

Although there has been some improvement in transparency releases since the Labour government came into office, there is “enormous room for improvement”, a report commissioned by the Ethics and Integrity Commission has found.

The EIC asked Spotlight on Corruption, Transparency International UK and Unlock Democracy to conduct research into the operation of government transparency releases as part of its Lobbying, Disclosure, and Access to Government Review.

The report outlined a number of issues around the publication of transparency releases – which reveal who has access to key decision makers in Government – including:

a. Although there has been an improvement in timeliness since Q4 2024, there is no guarantee that this will continue, and transparency releases are still not published until 3-6 months after the meetings have taken place. This lack of timeliness can mean that the public is not aware of who the government is meeting in the crucial stages before bills are passed or decisions are made.

b. The meaningfulness of descriptions has remained the same throughout the past three years, with no noticeable improvement and the continued use of generic descriptors in contravention of Cabinet Office guidance.

c. There are significant gaps in the data where officials have not included meetings that we know from other sources took place.

d. The files are difficult to find and even more difficult to search, being published across 24 locations per quarter (for ministerial releases alone), in different file formats, with different file names, despite five years passing since CSPL and the Boardman review recommending transparency releases be centralised. This compares unfavourably to the searchability of other countries’ equivalent transparency releases.

e. Transparency releases are difficult, and sometimes impossible, to reconcile with the Lobbying Register, such as where it is not stated in the transparency register which client a consultant lobbyist is representing and where they are listed as having multiple clients in the Lobbying Register.

f. The transparency releases do not have explicitly stated objectives. We can infer objectives for them, including informing the public, holding politicians to account, and improving public trust, but the releases do not seem to be meeting these.

The EIC expects to publish its recommendations in July.

Also in this section

Aug 27, 2026

DfE "acting in concert" argument on repeated requests rejected as campaigner's appeals fail

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed three appeals brought by campaigner Dr Robert Abrahart against the Department for Education, upholding two findings that his requests were vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and confirming in the third that emails withheld under sections 35 and 42 were exempt, while rejecting the department's attempt to treat requests from…
Aug 03, 2026

Tribunal upholds Cabinet Office refusal to confirm whether ministers declared criminal convictions

The First-tier Tribunal has upheld, by a majority, the Cabinet Office's refusal to confirm or deny whether any serving government ministers declared criminal convictions during their appointment process, dismissing an appeal brought by Times journalist George Greenwood while ruling that the Information Commissioner erred in law by treating the relevant exemption as absolute rather than qualified.
Jul 29, 2026

Enforcement notice served on university after FOI compliance falls to 21% in a quarter

The Information Commissioner has issued an enforcement notice under section 52 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 against King's College London (KCL), requiring the university to publish an action plan by 17 August 2026, clear its backlog of overdue requests, and achieve a 90% in-time compliance rate by the end of the year, after finding systemic weaknesses in its request-handling…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800