Info Gov

The Scottish Information Commissioner has taken the unprecedented step of instructing solicitors to begin legal proceedings against the Scottish Government, after Ministers failed to comply with a formal decision requiring the release of information linked to the James Hamilton report into the conduct of former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.

In a statement issued on 23 January 2026, the Commissioner confirmed that the Government had not provided evidence of compliance with Decision 281/2025, which ordered disclosure of some material relating to the Hamilton investigation and associated legal advice. The Commissioner noted that the decision also required Ministers to issue a fresh response in relation to other information “which had been incorrectly withheld on cost grounds”.

The Scottish Government failed to meet an initial compliance deadline of 15 January 2026. The Commissioner wrote to Ministers the following day warning that legal action would follow if compliance was not demonstrated by 22 January.

With no evidence forthcoming, the Commissioner has now “instructed his solicitors to take the next steps in the certification process to the Court”. He stressed that full and timely compliance with Decision Notices is essential to the effective operation of FOI in Scotland, adding that he “will not hesitate in exercising his power to refer non compliance to the Court of Session”.

This marks the first time the Commissioner has referred a public authority to the Court of Session for non compliance with an FOI decision.

Once the matter is certified, the Court may investigate and has the power to treat a failure to comply as contempt of court.

The underlying FOI request sought information relating to the James Hamilton Report, which examined whether Nicola Sturgeon breached the Scottish Ministerial Code. The Commissioner’s December 2025 decision required partial disclosure and a revised response on other elements.

Also in this section

Jul 13, 2026

Polite, one-off request can still be vexatious where motive is personal, First-tier Tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the refusal of a freedom of information request to a special educational needs school as vexatious under section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding that a polite, factual and non-burdensome request could still amount to a misuse of the Act where its motive was the pursuit of a case against a named individual while…
Jul 13, 2026

Tribunal backs national security refusal of Home Protection Scheme statistics, citing mosaic disclosure risk

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Northern Ireland Office's refusal to disclose aggregate application and expenditure figures for its Home Protection Scheme, finding that even high-level statistical data could contribute to a "mosaic" of information capable of assisting terrorists in assessing the protection afforded to police officers and other public servants.
Jul 10, 2026

DWP holds Universal Credit migration code but extracting it would breach FOIA cost limit, tribunal rules

The First-tier Tribunal has overturned an Information Commissioner's finding that the Department for Work and Pensions held no further information about how claimants were selected for Universal Credit managed migration, but ruled that the requester will receive nothing more because the cost of extracting the material would exceed the limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000…
Jul 07, 2026

"Should have held" is not "held": tribunal upholds FCDO not-held response over Somaliland Crown service certificate

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal against the Information Commissioner's finding that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office did not hold a copy of a 1955 certificate awarded on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II to a member of the Haud Constabulary in colonial-era Somaliland, concluding on the balance of probabilities that no in-scope information…
Jul 07, 2026

Requester's claim that ICO confused him with his son fails to defeat section 14 vexatiousness finding

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has upheld the Information Commissioner's reliance on section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse a request about a parish council's data protection registration, finding that the request formed part of a campaign of harassment against the council even though the appellant claimed the requesting history relied on belonged not…
Jul 07, 2026

Late compliance, apology and resource pressures save council from contempt certification over EIR decision notice

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has refused to certify Guildford Borough Council to the Upper Tribunal for contempt over its admitted failure to comply with a substituted decision notice within the required 35 days, finding that the council's late and piecemeal response was capable of constituting contempt but that later compliance, an apology and an explanation grounded in…

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800