Info Gov

The Scottish Information Commissioner has taken the unprecedented step of instructing solicitors to begin legal proceedings against the Scottish Government, after Ministers failed to comply with a formal decision requiring the release of information linked to the James Hamilton report into the conduct of former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.

In a statement issued on 23 January 2026, the Commissioner confirmed that the Government had not provided evidence of compliance with Decision 281/2025, which ordered disclosure of some material relating to the Hamilton investigation and associated legal advice. The Commissioner noted that the decision also required Ministers to issue a fresh response in relation to other information “which had been incorrectly withheld on cost grounds”.

The Scottish Government failed to meet an initial compliance deadline of 15 January 2026. The Commissioner wrote to Ministers the following day warning that legal action would follow if compliance was not demonstrated by 22 January.

With no evidence forthcoming, the Commissioner has now “instructed his solicitors to take the next steps in the certification process to the Court”. He stressed that full and timely compliance with Decision Notices is essential to the effective operation of FOI in Scotland, adding that he “will not hesitate in exercising his power to refer non compliance to the Court of Session”.

This marks the first time the Commissioner has referred a public authority to the Court of Session for non compliance with an FOI decision.

Once the matter is certified, the Court may investigate and has the power to treat a failure to comply as contempt of court.

The underlying FOI request sought information relating to the James Hamilton Report, which examined whether Nicola Sturgeon breached the Scottish Ministerial Code. The Commissioner’s December 2025 decision required partial disclosure and a revised response on other elements.

Also in this section

Sep 23, 2026

Redacted rights: When does Article 10 ECHR confer a right to information?

A three-judge panel of the Upper Tribunal (Lady Poole, UTJ Citron and UTJ Brewer) in Cruelty Free International v Information Commissioner & Home Office [2026] UKUT 328 (AAC) has held that Article 10 ECHR can, in narrow circumstances, confer a right to receive information from a public authority - but that this particular Appellant still cannot have any. Georgina Pein analyses the ruling.
Sep 22, 2026

Tribunal blasts ICO for deciding EIR complaint without seeing withheld information

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against an Information Commissioner decision that a council's correspondence with a local newspaper about a resident was the resident's own personal data, but has criticised the Commissioner for reaching that decision without seeing the withheld information or engaging with the council, an approach it said caused months of delay and unnecessary cost.
Sep 18, 2026

Sector-wide hostility not enough for section 38(2) NCND "endangering effect" exemption

The Home Office was not entitled to neither confirm nor deny whether it held audit records for the Envigo RMS Belton animal research facility, the First-tier Tribunal has ruled, finding that evidence of a hostile environment around animal research did not establish the causal link to endangerment that section 38(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal upholds NI Prison Service refusal to reveal body scanner hit rate despite "wider public interest"

The First-tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal against the Northern Ireland Prison Service's (NIPS) refusal to disclose how many X-ray body scans of prisoners produced a positive indication and how many led to the recovery of contraband, finding that the figures would be likely to prejudice the prevention of crime and the maintenance of prison security under section 31 of the Freedom of…
Sep 14, 2026

Ofqual overturns ICO order to disclose braille exam error notifications by consent

The Information Commissioner has conceded a First-tier Tribunal appeal by Ofqual and agreed that event notifications submitted by exam boards about errors in braille versions of GCSE and A level papers can be withheld under section 31(1)(g) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, reversing a decision notice in which he had rejected the exemption and ordered disclosure.
Sep 14, 2026

Tribunal overturns "manifestly unreasonable" refusal after council's email tally falls apart

The First-tier Tribunal has ordered North Tyneside Council to respond afresh to a request for records about a school boundary fence after finding the council was not entitled to refuse it as manifestly unreasonable under regulation 12(4)(b) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004, and that the evidence it relied on to show a burdensome course of dealings did not bear scrutiny.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800