Info Gov

The Scottish Information Commissioner has taken the unprecedented step of instructing solicitors to begin legal proceedings against the Scottish Government, after Ministers failed to comply with a formal decision requiring the release of information linked to the James Hamilton report into the conduct of former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.

In a statement issued on 23 January 2026, the Commissioner confirmed that the Government had not provided evidence of compliance with Decision 281/2025, which ordered disclosure of some material relating to the Hamilton investigation and associated legal advice. The Commissioner noted that the decision also required Ministers to issue a fresh response in relation to other information “which had been incorrectly withheld on cost grounds”.

The Scottish Government failed to meet an initial compliance deadline of 15 January 2026. The Commissioner wrote to Ministers the following day warning that legal action would follow if compliance was not demonstrated by 22 January.

With no evidence forthcoming, the Commissioner has now “instructed his solicitors to take the next steps in the certification process to the Court”. He stressed that full and timely compliance with Decision Notices is essential to the effective operation of FOI in Scotland, adding that he “will not hesitate in exercising his power to refer non compliance to the Court of Session”.

This marks the first time the Commissioner has referred a public authority to the Court of Session for non compliance with an FOI decision.

Once the matter is certified, the Court may investigate and has the power to treat a failure to comply as contempt of court.

The underlying FOI request sought information relating to the James Hamilton Report, which examined whether Nicola Sturgeon breached the Scottish Ministerial Code. The Commissioner’s December 2025 decision required partial disclosure and a revised response on other elements.

Also in this section

May 15, 2026

Getting the timing right

The date for assessing whether a request is vexatious or manifestly unreasonable, in the context of freedom of information and environmental information refusal decisions, is an issue with a surprisingly long tail - particularly given its practical importance to public bodies when faced with information rights requests.
May 12, 2026

Tribunal dismisses appeal for audio recording of police misconduct hearing

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed a Freedom of Information appeal seeking disclosure of an audio recording of a Metropolitan Police misconduct hearing, finding that the detailed outcome report already published was sufficient to meet the legitimate interest in transparency.
May 12, 2026

Councils not required to publish full planning application forms on statutory register

The First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) has dismissed an appeal seeking unredacted disclosure of a planning application form, finding that local planning authorities are not legally obliged to place the entirety of such forms - including personal contact details and owner names - on the statutory planning register.
Apr 29, 2026

English Heritage loses appeal over Charlie Chaplin blue plaque research

The First-tier Tribunal has ruled that English Heritage must disclose internal historical research into Charlie Chaplin's suitability for a blue plaque, rejecting arguments that their release would harm the charity's commercial interests or create a chilling effect on its historians.

InfoGov Masthead Newsletter 800